Year: 2020

Sexual offences: Review mandatory reporting law

This letter was originally published in The Straits Times on 7 November 2020. 

The National University of Singapore (NUS) found itself in a conundrum in the recent case concerning former Tembusu College don Jeremy Fernando (Police report made without our consent, say victims, Nov 1).

NUS made a police report about Dr Fernando’s actions, despite both victims having declined to file their own reports. NUS has since explained that it was legally obligated to do so under Section 424 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Recognising that this may discourage future victims from speaking up, NUS dean of students Leong Ching stated that the decision was “one of the most difficult dilemmas” the university faced.

NUS is not alone in facing such a tricky situation. Other institutes of higher learning, schools, pastoral care services, support service organisations and companies have been in a similar situation – deciding whether to report when the victim does not want to.

Reporting is mandated “in the absence of reasonable excuse” and it is unclear if victims not wanting the organisation to report constitutes “reasonable excuse”.

Mandatory reporting can compound the feelings of helplessness that often afflict sexual assault survivors.

It can also have the unintended effect of deterring such victims from seeking help in the first place, for fear that they may be drawn into a police investigation against their wishes.

We wholeheartedly agree with Professor Chan Wing Cheong that Section 424 should be reviewed (Clarity needed in legal duty to report crimes, Oct 28).

Mandatory reporting laws facilitate law enforcement as they deter the concealment of knowledge relating to offences. So these laws can be helpful.

One way forward is the approach taken by New South Wales where the law limits the mandatory reporting obligation to situations where a party knows that they have information that might be of material assistance in securing the conviction of the offender.

It also helpfully elaborates that “reasonable excuse” includes situations where adult victims do not want a police report to be made.

Further, special permission must be obtained to prosecute the following professionals for not reporting: legal and medical practitioners, social workers and clergy.

The Association of Women for Action and Research once again asks that the state review Section 424 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and hopes the Government will do this soon.

Corinna Lim, Executive Director, AWARE

Why men should care and do more about women’s issues

This commentary was originally published in Channel NewsAsia on 7 November 2020. 

SINGAPORE: A while ago, I was watching the Netflix series Sex Education.

For the uninitiated, Sex Education follows Otis, a teenager who starts giving out advice to his school mates after years of observing his single mother – a sex therapist – counselling her clients.

In one particular episode, Otis and his mother have a huge argument that they can’t seem to resolve. In response to Otis’ stubbornness, his exasperated mother says:

As the primary carer in your life, I always get your worst. And I’m tired of it.

As the only son of a single mother too, I think about that scene a lot. Like Otis’ mother, almost all of the workload and responsibility fell onto my mother after my parents’ divorce.

And like Otis’ father in the show, who is separated from the family, my father seemed to escape these responsibilities. He moved out, spent weekends and holidays with his friends, while my mother worried constantly about housing us, making financial ends meet and being a good parent to me.

A WELCOME GENDER REVIEW

I thought about that scene again about a month ago, when it was announced that Singapore will embark on a comprehensive review of issues affecting women to bring about a mindset change on values like gender equality and respect for women.

The review is the first of its kind and marks a welcome shift — the announcement articulated that “changes to Singapore’s cultural value system” are needed, as opposed to just piecemeal solutions.

However, there was one thing missing in the announcement: An explicit call for men to get involved in the process.

Gender discrimination, and the structural barriers that women face, exist because generations of men have been complicit (consciously or unconsciously) in the oppressive system of patriarchy.

A lot of men have held onto misogynistic views, perpetuated unconscious biases, relegated women to the space of the home, discriminated at work based on gender, committed sexual and domestic violence, and so on.

This review, then, is an opportunity for men to think about how we can inculcate the importance of gender equality into other men. It would be remiss if we didn’t get involved in this review and if we let women do all the work.

For the men that need convincing, there is extensive international literature that suggests that men in gender-equal societies are better off than those in less equal ones.

These men tend to be healthier, both mentally and physically, and more satisfied with life on multiple fronts. As such, it is only in our own interests to show support for gender equality and to try and find ways to achieve it.

However, I don’t want to dwell too much on studies and disembodied analyses, because gender equality and equity is personal to me.

WOMEN DOING THE WORK ON BEHALF OF MEN

As I mentioned, for years I witnessed the struggles of my single mother. My maternal grandmother was also a single mother. So I have come to see how gendered this phenomenon can be.

Care work, for too long, has fallen almost exclusively on the shoulders of women without any choice in the matter, and often without compensation.

Bearing the responsibility of managing the household, caring for children, are all forms of labour that are rarely distributed evenly.

For example, in June, a National University of Singapore research revealed that on average, mothers spend more than twice as much time as fathers directly engaged with their child on weekdays.

This then results in the lack of accountability seen in men. Time and time again we see emotionally absent or distant fathers, fathers who leave the parenting to their wives.

This isn’t because they’re ill equipped to parent — there’s nothing inherent in men that makes them poor carers. More likely, men are socialised to see this as work they don’t need to do.

This may not be a belief that is explicitly articulated. But one only needs to look at how paternity leave is structured and thought about to see how deeply ingrained this line of thinking is.

By law, employers are only obligated to give two weeks of paternity leave in Singapore, compared to at least 12 weeks of maternity leave.

While numerous organisations do give more than the mandatory two weeks’ paternity leave, the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) reported that 6 in 10 fathers still did not take paternity leave in 2018.

It goes without saying that this imbalance of care work is even more pronounced for single mothers, where all the responsibility has to be taken up by one person — like my mum.

GENDER INEQUALITY HARMS MEN TOO

Beyond housework and parenting, men also tend to delegate emotional labour to women. And while that may not strike you as “real work”, ensuring the psychological well-being of others is a mental load that strains the bandwidth of many women.

Many men see emotional and mental well-being as “feminine” and unimportant concepts. This mentality prevents them from seeking help and support—especially from other men — and from developing emotional literacy and intelligence.

For example, a 2016 Canadian study found that among 360 respondents who had experienced depression or suicidal ideation, more men than women were embarrassed about seeking formal treatment for depression.

This penalises men around the world to an enormous degree. It is tragic, but not surprising, that three times as many men as women die by suicide in high-income countries, as reported by the World Health Organization in 2018.

We end up being so paralysed by the expectation of being stoic and “rational”, we end up hurting ourselves and the people around us.

We wear this mask of invulnerability so tight that it ends up being self-destructive – choosing not to seek professional help (or assuming that talking to our female partners is sufficient), or resorting to violence when things get too bottled up.

We don’t emotionally connect, and we don’t emotionally invest. We rarely unpack or de-escalate. Imagine then, the kinds of role models and modes of masculinity that exist in this world for the next generation.

MEN MUST PLAY THEIR PART

The cycle must be broken, and that work lies squarely on men. Men are the only ones who can become better men; women cannot do that work for us.

It is my job to improve myself, using everything my mother has taught me.

Like what it means to be accountable to the people who rely on you, what it means to be honest in your communication, what it means to love openly, to be a better person, a better man, a better role model.

I do have hope that the tides are turning. I have had many powerful conversations with men who recognise the need to work towards a more gender-equal society. But more of us need to put in the labour.

Undeniably, most men have exhibited some form of misogyny and toxic masculinity in the past; I know I have. It might be something seemingly small, like making sexist jokes or an inappropriate comment, or it might be a form of discrimination that was more overt.

But the aim here is not to strive for some form of ethical purity that doesn’t exist. Rather, it is to recognise our mistakes, hold ourselves accountable to said mistakes, and learn to be better moving forward.

So what’s next? What do we do?

Make your voices heard. Call out toxic behaviour. Stop relying solely on women for emotional work and start developing emotional literacy amongst your male friends.

And finally, demonstrate your support for this review on women’s issues by participating however you can. There is value and power in showing up.

And it’s important to show that we, as men, are willing to put in that work to fight for gender equality so we become better role models for the next generation of partners, husbands, fathers, sons.

Kristian-Marc James Paul, AWARE member

Position Filled: Part-Time CARE Administrative Executive, Women’s Care Centre

We are no longer accepting applicants for this role.

AWARE’s Women’s Care Centre (WCC) is looking for a CARE Administrative Executive to support the centre in administrative and operational matters. The role also requires support to be provided for staff and volunteers on various projects, reports and ad-hoc programmes as and when required.

Position: CARE Administrative Executive
Department:
Women’s Care Centre
Commitment: Part-time (24-hour work week); one-year contract (with possibility of extension)
Salary range: $1,500 – $2,200
Starting date: Immediate
Citizenship: Singapore citizen/PR or non-Singaporean holding Dependent’s Pass, LTVP or LTVP+ pass

Job Description

  • Providing administrative and operational support to the counselling and support group team
  • Scheduling clients with counsellors via phone, emails and/or face-to-face
  • Supporting incoming client and volunteer queries
  • Maintaining volunteer contracts, payment records and being responsible for prompt processing of invoices for the department
  • Documenting and filing confidential notes, intake forms, etc.
  • Establishing processes for client feedback and ensuring prompt submission to relevant parties/systems
  • Supporting volunteer counsellor and support group facilitator recruitment, onboarding and engagement
  • Supporting staff and volunteers on various projects, reports and ad-hoc programmes as required by the line manager

Requirements

  • Minimum two year’s experience as an office administrator, office assistant or relevant role
  • Experience in the social service industry is advantageous
  • Excellent interpersonal, empathy and communication skills in English (verbal and written) and strong organisational skills
  • Strong knowledge of Microsoft Office (PowerPoint, Excel, MS Word)
  • Able to use initiative and judgment to solve problems independently
  • Strong belief in gender equality and the values of AWARE
  • Able to meet deadlines in a high-paced environment while balancing workload and competing priorities
  • Able to maintain strict confidentiality of sensitive information

Read our privacy policy here.

Please note that due to the large number of applications, only shortlisted applicants will be contacted for an interview. If you have any questions about this position, please email careers@aware.org.sg.

1, 8, 15 December 2020: Birds & Bees, a workshop for parents about sex education

“This was valuable… it made me reflect on my own values regarding sex and what I may project onto my children.”

“It opens up our inhibitions and gives us real opportunities to put [our thoughts into] words.”

“Often boys are let off the hook, but I think they should be mindful and learn about boundaries, especially in this day and age when lines are blurred and there’s so much to access online.”

“Can they do this in school for our children?”

– Previous Birds & Bees workshop attendees

Most parents believe that it is important to talk to their children about sex, but many are uncertain how to do it. But what happens when you keep putting it off until the children are “older”? Where do your children get answers to questions they can’t ask you? (The internet is one such place, and young people say they are most likely to ask peers and romantic partners.)

Birds & Bees is an experiential workshop for parents, developed by parents, to explore what works for you when talking to your child about romantic relationships and sex. A variety of formats will be used, including opportunities for dialogue, discussion and reflection

Most parents want to be an “ask-able” parent: to be the approachable adult who is open to questions and who their child turns to for answers. Attend this workshop to explore how you can work on developing your own strategies to enhance the trust and bond with your child!

All parents would find the content useful and applicable. For this online workshop, we are giving priority to parents of children aged 10-15 so that the discussions can be more age-targeted.

Places are limited so do sign up quickly!

Date: Tuesdays – 1, 8, 15 December (Participants are expected to attend all three sessions)

Time: 8:00 – 9.30pm (1.5 hours)

Workshop Fee: $15 (in total, covering all three sessions)

Survey: After you sign up, you will be asked to complete a short pre-workshop survey about the age(s) and number of your children. This is very important so that parents with children of similar ages can be grouped together to that you will get the most out of the workshop.

Special instructions for online workshop: As small-group discussions are a big part of the workshop, participants are expected to switch on their video as well as audio whenever possible, and to join in the discussions for maximum benefit.

Refunds and cancellations: Unfortunately we will not be offering refunds. In exceptional circumstances, if you are unable to attend the subsequent sessions, you will be able to join the next set of workshops if you write in to publiceducation@aware.org.sg in advance giving your reasons.

**If you would like to join the workshop but cannot make it at this time, please fill in the indication of interest form.

Register here.

28 November 2020: AWAREHouse Party, a virtual fundraiser celebrating 35 years of LOVE and RAGE

We celebrate AWARE’s 35th birthday with an OutRAGEous virtual AWAREHouse Party multiverse! Gather your crew and dress up your home, complete with your House name and signature looks, to show off your LOVE for the OutRAGEous alongside other AWAREHouse Parties happening all across Singapore.

Our annual fundraiser keeps our work alive: from supporting women in distress through our Helpline and Sexual Assault Care Centre, to our long-standing research and advocacy work, which contributes to changes in law and removes barriers to gender equality.

Date: Saturday, 28 Nov 2020
Time: 7pm
Venue: Your living room! (You’ll connect to the main programme via Zoom)
Dress theme: OutRAGEous party wear – what you’d put on to hit a rave, in 1985 or today! (Get inspiration here)

Packages

Support our work while enjoying an OutRAGEously fun time!

  • Individual Package: $350 p.p.
  • Group Package: $1,800 for min of 6 pax ($300 p.p.)
  • VIP Group Package: $3,000 for min of 6 pax ($500 p.p.)

All packages come with exclusive virtual access to our OutRAGEous night of entertainment and curated food from Grand Hyatt Singapore.

Looking to impress and upgrade your night? The VIP Party of 6 is sure to delight with an exquisite menu paired with two bottles of bubbly and other exciting treats.

Book package here | Donate here


Entertainment

Our all-time favourite entertainer, Pam Oei, will host this year’s show with Singapore’s larger-than-life drag queen Becca D’BusChestnuts make their long-awaited return to the fan favourite Alamak Awards to roast the most OutRAGEous sexist instances this year. No party’s complete without music—the lineup also includes Asian DJ Icon Aldrin Quek and more surprise acts to fuel the evening’s soundtrack.


HOST
Pam Oei

Pam has been in more than 100 theatre, television and film productions and is known equally for being a dramatic and comedic actor. In 2010, this multi-hyphenate produced and directed AWARE’s 25th-anniversary fundraiser, Superwomen in Concert, at the Esplanade Concert Hall, raising $350,000 in a single night. Pam is also the lead singer of Singaporean rock band Ugly in the Morning.



HOST
Becca D’Bus
Becca D’Bus is Singapore’s biggest drag queen. In non-pandemic emergency times, she is the producer and host of RIOT!, Singapore’s only drag revue, as well as the series “The Glory Hoes present” at The Projector. She is one of the organisers of IndigNation, Singapore’s month-long Pride season. In pandemic emergency times, she has started a project called Cover Your Pie Hole, whereby she makes masks out of materials that were intended to become her costumes. She has generally avoided the use of the word “pivot”.



PARODY GROUP

Chestnuts
Singapore’s very first and longest-running parody show, Chestnuts, has spoofed movies, TV, current affairs, popular music and the theatre scene, always with a loving sense of nonsense and the sharp sting of social commentary. Since 1996, their unique brand of parody have made fans of audiences and critics alike. Chestnuts is now a must-see staple in many a Singapore satire-lover’s calendar.



MUSIC DIRECTOR

Elaine Chan
Elaine is an award-winning music theatre composer, arranger and director. She is the first female composer to write and direct music for the National Day Parade, and has written hits for popular theatre productions such as the Dim Sum Dollies and Wild Rice’s Aladdin. She is also an honoured recipient of the 22nd COMPASS Award for Artistic Excellence in 2017.



DJ

Aldrin Quek
Aldrin has been nominated for Best Newcomer at the Ibiza DJ Awards, described as Asia’s number-one DJ by British dance magazine Muzik and voted “Best Local DJ” in both Juice and I-S magazines in Singapore. He has been a key figure in building up Singapore’s vibrant dance scene since the mid-’90s. As the musical ambassador to the legendary nightclub Zouk in Singapore from 1996 to 2013, Aldrin’s signature ONE nights packed the club with faithful fans. He also flew the club’s flag with guest spots in clubbing capitals all over the globe, including Ibiza, London, Berlin, New York and Tokyo.

Alamak Awards

Get ready to vote for your favourite OutRAGEous Alamaks. The well-loved Chestnuts return after a two-year hiatus to perform another side-splitting edition of AWARE’s infamous Alamak Awards.Alamak Awards

Songs we know and love receive twisted new lyrics from comic genius Jonathan Lim, while local musical theatre icon Elaine Chan and video designer Genevieve Peck weave them into a musical mash-up to remember! Together with Timothy WanNatalie Yeap and Candice de RozarioChestnuts will have you rolling in laughter and cheering until you’re hoarse as they skewer the year’s most OutRAGEous sexist moments.

Limited service for AWARE’s CARE and WHDA services: Nov-Dec 2020

Our Women’s Care Centre, Sexual Assault Care Centre and Workplace Harassment and Discrimination Advisory will provide limited service over November and December 2020, to allow us to make some operational changes that will strengthen our capabilities into the new year. All our operations will fully resume from 4 January 2021 onwards.

We seek your kind understanding and patience during this period.

For emergencies, please call 999 for the police. You can also call 1800 221 4444 for the Samaritans of Singapore (SOS) if you have thoughts of hurting yourself, including thoughts of suicide.

 

 
Sexual Assault Care Centre (SACC)
Limited service period 1 November 2020 to 24 December 2020
What is open?

SACC Helpline (6779 0282) will operate 10am-3pm, Mondays to Fridays. If you are unable to reach us, please leave a voicemail.

If your sexual assault occurred within the last 72 hours, we will endeavour to provide appointments through the SACC helpline for case management, befriending, legal consultation and counselling service. (You may also refer to this page for suggested actions.)

If your sexual assault did not occur within the last 72 hours, you can call our SACC helpline for interim support and referrals to other organisations. However, appointments for SACC case management, befriending, legal consultation and counselling will only be available in January 2021. Please reach out to us again to book an appointment from 4 January 2021.

For existing clients, please reach out to your case coordinator/case manager for further information about availability of appointments.

 

What is closed? WhatsApp, email and walk-in services will not be operational during this period.

SACC case management, befriending, legal consultation and counselling are not available for cases where the assault occured more than 72 hours prior.

Full closure for holidays AWARE is closed from 25 December 2020 through to 1 January 2021.
When will all services resume? Our operations will fully resume 4 January 2021 onwards.

 

 
Women’s Care Centre (WCC)
Limited service period 7 December 2020 to 24 December 2020
What is open? Women’s Helpline (1800 777 5555) will operate 10am-3pm, Mondays to Fridays. If you are unable to reach us, please leave a voicemail.
What is closed? Our online chat, call-back service, counselling and legal clinic will not be operational during the limited service period.
Full closure for holidays AWARE is closed from 25 December 2020 through to 1 January 2021.
When will all services resume? Our operations will fully resume 4 January 2021 onwards.

 

 
Workplace Harassment and Advisory (WHDA)
Limited service period 1 November 2020 to 24 December 2020
What is open? WHDA Helpline (6777 0318) will operate 10am-3pm, Mondays to Fridays. If you are unable to reach us, please email whda@aware.org.sg.

For existing clients, please reach out to your advisor for further information about availability of appointments.

What is closed? Befriending services will not be available for all WHDA cases.
Full closure for holidays AWARE is closed from 25 December 2020 through to 1 January 2021.
When will all services resume? Our operations will fully resume 4 January 2021 onwards.

‘Retirement matching’ scheme needs tweaking

This letter was originally published in The Straits Times on 28 October 2020. 

In the 2020 Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index report, Singapore’s pension system ranked top in Asia and seventh out of 39 systems assessed (Singapore retains top spot in Asia on retirement income index, Oct 20).

This year, systems were accessed on whether or not they provide additional contributions or benefits for parents caring for young children while the parent is not in the paid workforce.

This recognises the gender gap in many systems, resulting from unequal norms around caregiving that make it difficult for women to participate in the labour force, and thus make it difficult for them to accumulate pension funds.

The report stated that 17 systems provide some form of pension benefit for those taking time out of the workforce for caregiving. Singapore was not among them.

In Singapore, a significant gender gap in Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings persists, though it was narrowed from 16 per cent in 2006 to 11 per cent in 2016.

The retirement adequacy of women, as a whole, is a cause for concern. This is especially true of inactive CPF members, that is, those who do not have any CPF employment contribution paid for them for the current month, or any of the preceding three months.

Last year, women formed 62.6 per cent of persons who were not employed.

The CPF Matched Retirement Savings Scheme, which takes effect next year, is designed to help, among other people, caregivers (and therefore women).

Under the matching scheme, a contribution must first be made (by anyone – CPF members or their family members) before the Government matches it. Family members who are poor may not be able to contribute to one another’s accounts to benefit from the scheme.

The Government should look into more forms of, or improve on existing, non-contributory schemes to ensure that everyone attains a Basic Retirement Sum. The Government should consider establishing annual automatic basic contributions by the state to low-balance individual CPF accounts.

Chong Ning Qian, Senior Executive of Research, AWARE

Domestic workers need support to shoulder caregiver burden

This letter was originally published in The Straits Times on 23 October 2020.

Caregiving places significant strain on one’s finances, as well as physical and mental well-being. When caregivers experience burnout due to insufficient rest, they pose a risk to themselves and others (Caregivers need to seek support to avoid burnout: Experts, Oct 19).

One group of caregivers often overlooked are the migrant domestic workers who many households here increasingly depend on to care for the rapidly ageing population.

When family members struggle to care for their elderly relatives, they cope by passing on most of the physical labour, and some emotional labour, to their domestic helpers. But these workers lack the support to cope with their caregiver burden.

An ongoing qualitative study by the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) on caregiver burden experienced by 25 migrant domestic workers providing eldercare in Singapore identified the lack of access to caregiving-specific information and emotional support as contributors to the burden.

Other factors are overwork and inaccurate matching to eldercare jobs.

Support organisations for migrant domestic workers are not equipped to provide caregiving-related information, while existing caregiver-support networks often focus on family caregivers.

Domestic workers must constantly adapt to the evolving needs of their care recipients. When the condition of care recipients worsens, they become more dependent on the domestic workers, further increasing their workload. New caregiving duties may include tube-feeding, managing new medication, assisting more frequently with toileting and/or diaper changes, and closer supervision to prevent falls and injuries.

Without adequate support, some workers struggle to cope with these new responsibilities. Yet, fearing for their jobs, they avoid voicing their concerns in case their employers see them as incompetent.

At present, employers and employment agencies are not incentivised to provide adequate caregiver-specific support to domestic workers employed for eldercare.

However, such support is important in mitigating the caregiver burden.

One way to help would be to provide training and informational resources about their care recipients’ medical conditions, especially as their needs evolve. Accompanying this, emotional support can help to reduce the workers’ fatigue from their emotional labour and prevent burnout.

Kimberly Wong Ying Zhen

Research Executive

AWARE

Is drinking the problem in cases of sexual assault?

This commentary was originally published in Channel NewsAsia on 19 October 2020.

SINGAPORE: We have been here before.

A case of sexual assault is reported in the media. Comments focusing on the victim’s behaviour start to proliferate on social media. Several people – mostly women – push back, pointing out that these comments are steeped in simplistic myths and misconceptions about sexual assault.

But no one’s mind seems to change. Another case is reported. And the cycle repeats itself ad nauseum.

This time, the case involves a former Grab driver. He is on trial for assaulting a drunk woman he picked up from a bar downtown. She was found the following morning without her skirt and underpants, on a road outside her apartment, by another Grab driver.

That same day the driver claimed trial, another case of a drunk woman who went over to her friend’s apartment, where she was sexually assaulted by the friend’s brother, was heard in court.

Many people responded to media reports of these cases with empathy and support for the survivors.

But soon enough, other comments popped up, many depressingly predictable and seen before: Blaming the victim for being assaulted because of how much she had to drink and offering unsolicited advice to women about the ill fate that can befall them if they go out at night.

RAPE MYTHS INVOLVING INTOXICATED WOMEN 

Around the world, a woman’s consumption of alcohol often becomes a thorn in the side of her reputation and the veracity of her claims, particularly in cases of sexual assault.

Pair women with alcohol, and our perceptions seem to warp. Women who drink frequently are seen as promiscuous.

A 2019 study by researchers at Iowa State University of respondents based in the United States found that just holding a beer bottle increased perceptions of sexual availability for women – i.e. they were more likely to be seen as single or open to having casual sex.

Alcohol features in rape myths – a set of beliefs that downplay, discredit or justify sexual assault claims – by reinforcing the idea that survivors have contributed to their own fate and are responsible for what happened to them.

“She could have avoided the assault if she hadn’t made herself vulnerable by drinking alcohol” is a common refrain. One result of this is that sexual assault survivors forced to drink are typically accorded more public sympathy than those who drank out of their own volition.

BLAMING THE VICTIM, EXCUSING THE PERPETRATOR

While alcohol is usually pointed to as a survivor’s fatal mistake, it is often an excuse for a perpetrator’s “careless, unintentional” actions.

A 2010 study of 288 students in Germany found evidence of this double standard: Respondents held intoxicated perpetrators less responsible for their sexually aggressive actions, while holding intoxicated victims more responsible for being victims of sexual assault.

In some cases, perpetrators use this to their advantage as a defence against allegations of sexual assault, arguing that their intoxication equates to diminished responsibility.

In the United Kingdom, courts have entertained involuntary intoxication as a possible defence, but have generally ignored the defendant’s voluntary intoxication in establishing criminal intent to commit sexual violence. But drunken intent is still intent.

Alcohol affected their cognitive and motor skills, they say, impairing their ability to process and react to verbal and non-verbal behaviour. In that state, it was not their fault, they say, that they forced themselves on someone, ignoring the other person’s non-consent.

There is indeed a plethora of evidence showing that alcohol often leads to bad decisions and actions. But we don’t typically use alcohol to excuse perpetrators of any other crime. When a drunk driver crashes his car, nobody balks at penalising him for his decision to drink and drive.

So why is sexual assault treated differently? When a drunk man assaults a drunk woman, why don’t we first tell men not to drink, before telling the same to women?

Underlying all this is, perhaps, the pessimistic assumption that “men can’t help themselves”. Why cajole a person for something they can’t control, this line of thinking goes. Best to advise the person who is in control of herself.

The toxic assumption is that men can’t help but molest, harass and hurt those around them. It’s how they are wired.

Are men offended by this line of thinking that erases their sense of decency, agency and cognitive abilities? They should be. We are, on their behalf.

As survivor Chanel Miller writes in her book, “I understand you are not supposed to walk into a lion’s den because you could be mauled. But lions are wild animals. And boys are people, they have minds … Groping others was not a natural reflex, biologically built in.”

Miller, whom Stanford swimmer Brock Turner assaulted while she was incapacitated, asks: “Why was passing out considered more reprehensible than fingering the passed-out person?”

HOW DRUNK IS ‘DRUNK’?

We know – or should know by now – that an unconscious person cannot agree to sexual activity. Neither can someone who is intoxicated to the point of incapacity.

But what does “incapacity to consent” really mean? How do we establish boundaries between being “very drunk” and “incapacitated”?

Singapore’s Penal Code says that the person must be unable to understand the nature and consequence of the act to which they give their consent.

To determine this, courts have looked at factors such as how aware the complainant was of their surroundings, physical weakness, nausea, if they were slipping in and out of sleep, control over motor movements, whether the complainant remembers significant details of behaviour or the incident itself, and others.

Yet, sometimes, the court of public opinion sets an impossible bar for victims to clear. If the victim doesn’t remember all the details of the incident, public observers and netizens are quick to deem her whole account unreliable.

On the other hand, if she does remember the incident, then maybe she wasn’t so drunk that she was incapable of consenting.

We seem to ask victims to be a Goldilocks-style “just the right amount” of drunk: Incapacitated, but with an unblemished, consistent memory of the assault. We can be quick to condemn a victim of sexual assault so long as she drinks.

Yet the ugly truth is many instances of sexual assault go unreported. Seven out of 10 survivors who come to AWARE’s Sexual Assault Care Centre (SACC) do not end up filing a formal report.

Rape myths, and in particular attitudes and perceptions that observers and bystanders hold towards sexual assault victims, play a crucial role in influencing these decisions.

These attitudes and perceptions play an important role in the victim’s treatment and recovery, as well. Research has found that negative social reactions, including social media comments, are significantly associated with increased psychological distress and delayed recovery.

This is why we often tell our clients to stay away from social media when their cases are in the news. And why we need social media users to think twice about the comments they may mindlessly shoot off about sexual assaults.

ADDRESSING RAPE MYTHS

Rape myths have to be dismantled before they pile damage onto another survivor, beyond what she has already suffered during her assault.

One way to do this is to introduce gender role education in all sexuality education programmes in Singapore. Instead of shying away from talking about sexual consent, we need to build a culture of consent in all social situations.

Attitudes towards sexual assault are often linked to traditional gender roles, including socially sanctioned behaviour for boys and girls we as parents, guardians and adults intentionally or unintentionally perpetuate – forward, even aggressive and domineering for the former, chaste and passive for the latter.

Let’s teach our children how empty those stereotypes are and what a respectful relationship when it comes to sex looks like.

Shailey Hingorani, Head of Research and Advocacy, AWARE